File:  [Repository] / kupu / doc / OLDBROWSERS.txt
Revision 1.1.1.1 (vendor branch): download - view: text, annotated - select for diffs - revision graph
Thu Sep 15 13:06:00 2005 UTC (18 years, 8 months ago) by dwinter
Branches: first, MAIN
CVS tags: dwinter, HEAD
modifizierter kupu fuer webpages des instituts

Old browsers and Kupu
=====================

  Written by: Guido Wesdorp
  Email: guido@infrae.com
  Valid for: Kupu 1.0.2

Partially supporting other browsers in Kupu
-------------------------------------------

When the client is using a browser that is not supported in Kupu, currently 
the results are unpredictable, but quite certainly not graceful. Kupu does
*not* try to degrade in older browsers, it will just not work. The reason
nothing has been added to Kupu to make it for instance show a textarea where
the iframe would have been, is that it's almost impossible to write a good
solution using the JavaScript techniques Kupu uses, since in Kupu' setup
(where the HTML contains part of the editor, unlike systems where the editor
pane isn't configurable and is added to the document using document.write)
it would mean elements should be removed from the page, which may not be 
possible using JavaScript or CSS since those technologies may not even be
available.

What to do then?
----------------

The only proper solution to create a feel of 'graceful degradation' is by
serving different pages according to the HTTP UserAgent header. A script
on the server should try to figure out what browser the client is using (well
actually it just needs to know if it's one of the browsers supported by Kupu)
and if it's an Kupu capable one send the Kupu page, and if it's not, it should
serve a page containing some fallback form or so. Since this process differs
a *lot* from server to server, we will not provide a sample implementation,
but instead we will try to tell how to create one yourself.

First step: is the client Kupu capable?
---------------------------------------

When you're going to write a script to serve different pages to different 
clients, you will probably want to examine the HTTP 'UserAgent' header. This
is a header the client sends along with the request, that contains information
about the user agent (browser) the client is using. The browser is supported 
if:

    - the string starts with 'Mozilla'
    - the string contains one of the following elements: 'IE 5.5', 'IE 6' (the
        part after 'IE ' should be higher than 5.5 after a convertion to 
        float) for Internet Explorer or one of: 'rv:1.3.1', 'rv:1.4', 'rv:1.5', 
        'rv:1.6' (the part after 'rv:' should be higher than 1.3.1 after 
        conversion to float) for Mozilla and Netscape Navigator.
        
If the UserAgent string matches those criteria, the browser is supported. Note
that that doesn't necessarily mean that Kupu will work: the client must have
JavaScript enabled as well, and the supported browsers all allow the client to
turn it off. However, Kupu will (XXX currently *should*!) provide some feedback
to the client about what can be done to get Kupu to work.

Second step: create a response
------------------------------

The second step will be to create a response suitable for the client's user 
agent. In most cases there will be 1 response for Kupu capable browsers (the 
Kupu page) and 1 for non-capable ones. The one for non-supported browsers will
probably contain a form and send the contents of some textarea that contains 
the HTML that would normally be edited in the Kupu iframe to a script on the
server that cleans it up (since Kupu is not available the server should do the
cleanup by itself!) and saves it. The page will probably be a normal HTML form
without too much fancy stuff, since the client's browser may well be one that
doesn't know how to display fancy stuff anyway.

Third step: process the response
--------------------------------

The last step will involve writing a script to process the data coming from 
the form. The script will have to receive its data in a POST request, since 
plain HTML forms don't provide PUT support. The script will probably look a 
lot different from the one that saves Kupu' output, so it's advised to not use 
the same script for handling both form output and Kupu, but instead to write
a new one that handles only one task. The goal of both scripts will be the 
same, however: make the content ready for storage and store it.

And that's it
-------------

And basically that's it: now if a non-capable browser requests a page, it will
receive something it can handle, the page will (probably) contain only the
most basic HTML elements, and it will use one of the most basic ways of 
sending data to the client, HTTP POST. The proposed way is not easy to 
implement, since it requires a lot of effort from integrators of Kupu compared
to other systems, but it will allow flexibility and configurability without
making concessions in flexibility and technologies chosen (Kupu won't have to
resort to document.write and customization can be done in the HTML rather than
having to hack background colors, button images etc. in the JavaScript).

FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>