= LAtin Ligatures

Latin ligatures seem to be not as complicated as GreekLigatures. The number is much smaller and the single letters are fairly readable. However, a list of examples should be provided.

These are the most common ligatures:
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.4862&wy=0.3757&ww=0.0901&wh=0.0155&mk=0.5286/0.3915&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ct]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.3659&wy=0.6228&ww=0.091&wh=0.039&mk=0.4108/0.651&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ∫∫]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.6638&wy=0.3603&ww=0.083&wh=0.0454&mk=0.7082/0.3921&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ∫t]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.5049&wy=0.4077&ww=0.0905&wh=0.016&mk=0.5515/0.4231&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ∫i]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.3939&wy=0.423&ww=0.1049&wh=0.0151&mk=0.4594/0.438&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ∫∫i]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.3468&wy=0.4281&ww=0.0837&wh=0.0404&mk=0.3827/0.4556&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg ii]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=13&ws=1&wx=0.1711&wy=0.6164&ww=0.0904&wh=0.0189&mk=0.2339/0.6328&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg fi]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib/index_html?pn=156&ws=1&wx=0.7066&wy=0.1152&ww=0.0664&wh=0.0194&mk=0.7168/0.1332&mode=imagepath&url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/163127KK/pageimg st]

  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/zogilib?fn=/permanent/archimedes_repository/large/eucli_eleme_515_la_1558/515-01-pageimg&pn=48&ws=1&wx=0.545&wy=0.6384&ww=0.2625&wh=0.1075&mk=0.6416/0.7024 e with ogonek]
  * [http://nausikaa2.rz-berlin.mpg.de/digitallibrary/digilib.jsp?fn=/permanent/archimedes_repository/large/thoma_tripl_512_la_1509/512-01-pageimg&pn=216&ws=1&wx=0.4074&wy=0.4271&ww=0.0467&wh=0.0099&mk=0.4177/0.4351&pt=300 co{l,n,r}]

Some more exotic ones:
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/zogilib?fn=/permanent/archimedes_repository/large/eucli_eleme_515_la_1558/515-01-pageimg&pn=50&ws=1&wx=0.3991&wy=0.8063&ww=0.3251&wh=0.0722&mk=0.4955/0.8492,0.5725/0.8491 qua and quo]
  * [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/zogilib?fn=/permanent/archimedes_repository/large/eucli_eleme_515_la_1558/515-01-pageimg&pn=50&ws=0.5&wx=0.63&wy=0.4653&ww=0.1434&wh=0.0289&mk=0.7082/0.4908 que (at the end of a word, meaning 'and')]

== Latin Ligatures and Unicode

I think the character in question should receive an official codepoint. Better still, qꝫ and q́ꝫ should have separate codepoints. I am aware that this is against the official policy of no longer accepting ligatures. My argument would be that qꝫ and q́ꝫ are part of a limited list of characters contained in early letter cases. Yes, I choose to ignore problems of upright versus italics, "qꝫ" versus "q;", or what this would mean for the long and massively font-specific list of ligatures and abbreviations in early Greek letter cases. Still, it would be nice.