= Conimbricensis 1606 =
Diversae (1606), Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu
[http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?url=/mpiwg/online/permanent/library/D9V0Q862/pageimg&pn=2&mode=imagepath ECHO]
(Please note: There are several short titles in use, namely "Diversae", "Conimbricensis" and "Conimbricenses".)
Part of [wiki:WO1].
Sent with DESpecs version 1.1.2.
Sent: ok/date.
Returned: 2009-02-05, [http://pythia.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/department1/mpdl/raw-texts/WO1_Conimbricensis_1606.txt/WO1_Conimbricensis_1606_V1.txt raw text]
== 1. First Analysis ==
=== Difficulties ===
* none?
=== Special Instructions ===
* and tags for anchored comments (see attachment)
== 2. Questions From Formax ==
=== Question 1 ===
=== Reply 1 ===
=== Special Instructions 2008-11-26 ===
Please note the following points regarding the marking of text flows and anchored marginal notes:
(a) Text flows
Text flow 1 has been marked correctly as
Cæteris ... a$pirarit.
igitur ... conabor.
Non ... collige-
b _Ari$totelis_] Quinque ... $ignificationem.
c _Genus, Differentia_] Notant ... po$$unt.
Seruauit ... Accidentium.
d _Cumque ad de$initiones_] Cognitionem ... appellat.
Qua ... cape$$enda.
Hoc ... vtile.
}}}
This is how we would like it:
{{{
igitur ... conabor.
Cæteris ... a$pirarit.
Non ... collige- re, ... Chry$aorio.
Seruauit ... Accidentium.
Qua ... cape$$enda.
Hoc ... vtile.
}}}
(b) Anchored marginal notes
In the work sample only one anchored comment has been recognized. All other anchored comments have been omitted. We would appreciate your best efforts in tagging the anchored comments. In particular, we emphasize that