Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of mpdl2.0-software-selection


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 28, 2011, 8:21:42 AM (14 years ago)
Author:
jwillenborg
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • mpdl2.0-software-selection

    v2 v3  
    22
    33== Software selection ==
    4 
    5 === eXist ===
    6 * Advantages
    7   * Xml support
    8   * already in use at MPIWG
    9 * Disadvantages
    10   * not scalable for many documents
    11   * not really stable
    12   * upload of documents sometimes produces system crashes
    134
    145=== mediaWiki ===
    … …  
    167  * scalable
    178  * stable
    18   * version control system
     9  * already in use at MPIWG (TRAC)
     10  * version control system included
    1911  * many users worldwide
    2012  * user interface
     13    * already included (Wiki web pages)
    2114    * simple (e.g. for data uploads)
    2215    * user know this system
    … …  
    2417    * footnotes: [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Footnotes internal], [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite Cite]
    2518    * [http://wikisource.org presentation of old books]
    26   * programming: php, Java over JavaBridge
     19  * programming: php, Java over JavaBridge
     20  * fulltext search contained (Lucene)
    2721  * free software
    2822* Disadvantages
    29   * XML support has to be implemented (relative easy)
     23  * XML/XSL support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
     24  * XQuery support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
     25
     26=== Magnolia ===
     27* Advantages
     28  * scalable
     29  * stable
     30  * already in use at MPIWG
     31  * many users worldwide
     32  * XML/XSL support
     33  * many extensions / templates
     34  * programming: Java, ... ?
     35  * fulltext search contained (Lucene) ?
     36  * free software
     37* Disadvantages
     38  * performance of many queries not tested ?
     39  * version control system included ?
     40  * user interface: all web pages have to be implemented ?
     41
     42=== eXist ===
     43* Advantages
     44  * XML/XSL support
     45  * already in use at MPIWG
     46  * many users worldwide
     47  * programming: Java, XQuery, XSL
     48  * fulltext search contained (Lucene)
     49  * free software
     50* Disadvantages
     51  * not scalable for many documents
     52  * not really stable
     53    * many system crashes at startup time (up to 2 days)
     54    * sometimes system crash when a document is uploaded
     55  * no usable version control system included
     56  * user interface: all web pages have to be implemented
     57  * not many extensions / templates
    3058
    3159=== eSciDoc ===
    … …  
    3361  * scalable
    3462  * already in use at MPIWG
     63  * version control system included
     64  * XML/XSL support
     65  * programming: Java
     66  * fulltext search contained (Lucene)
     67  * free software
    3568* Disadvantages
    3669  * not in use by many users
    37   * very complicated API
    38   * not many (free) developers
     70  * performance of many queries not tested
     71  * very complicated: much work for administration and development (API etc.)
     72  * not many users and developers
     73  * user interface: all web pages have to be implemented
     74  * not many extensions / templates
    3975
    40 === JackAss ===
    41 * Advantages
    42   * scalable
    43   * already in use at MPIWG
    44   * XML support
    45 * Disadvantages
    46   * performance of many queries not tested