wiki:mpdl2.0-software-selection

Version 6 (modified by jwillenborg, 13 years ago) (diff)

--

Future development MPDL

Software selection: frontend and backend system

Magnolia

  • URL: http://www.magnolia-cms.com/
  • Advantages
    • scalable
    • stable
    • performant
    • is used at MPIWG: see here
    • user management included (incl. LDAP)
    • version control system with easy usable history functions (commercial EE version)
    • notes/annotations: blog comments for each web page
    • many installations and users worldwide
    • many extensions / templates
    • programming: Freemarker, Java Server Pages, XSL, limited XPath (works also in JCR 2.0 ?)
    • fulltext search contained (Lucene)
    • multimedia support (image, sound, video)
    • free software (CE version)
    • MPDL software
      • document upload: stable and mostly included
  • Disadvantages
    • user interface: all web pages have to be implemented
    • XQuery support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
    • MPDL software
      • get page fragment in XML document: has to be implemented in JSP (relative easy)
      • language technology: has to be integrated by JSP's (relative easy)
      • viewer: has to be implemented by templates and JSP/XSL/HTML (relative easy)

mediaWiki

  • URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/MediaWiki
  • Advantages
    • scalable
    • stable
    • performant
    • is used at MPIWG: see for example this TRAC
    • user management included (incl. LDAP)
    • version control system with easy usable history functions (not free EE version)
    • notes/annotations: discussion of each web page possible
    • many installations and users worldwide
    • user interface
      • already included (Wiki web pages)
      • simple (e.g. for data uploads)
      • user know the Wiki system
      • no extra web server
    • many extensions / templates
    • programming: php, Java over JavaBridge?
    • fulltext search contained (Lucene)
    • multimedia support (image, sound, video)
    • free software
    • MPDL software
      • document upload: stable and mostly included
  • Disadvantages
    • XML/XSL support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
    • XQuery support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
    • MPDL software
      • get page fragment in XML document: has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
      • language technology: has to be integrated by Java programs (relative easy)
      • Viewer: Zope programs have to be implemented in Wiki/Java? (relative easy)

eXist + Zope

  • URL: http://exist.sourceforge.net/
  • Advantages
    • performant
    • XML/XSL support
    • is used at MPIWG: see MPDL system
    • some installations and users worldwide
    • XQuery/XPath support
    • programming: Java, XQuery/XPath, XSL
    • fulltext search contained (Lucene)
    • MPDL software
      • get page fragment in XML document: already implemented
      • viewer: available as Zope programs on another web server
      • document upload: already implemented
    • free software
  • Disadvantages
    • not scalable for many documents (> 1000 XML documents)
    • not really stable
      • many system crashes at startup time (up to 2 days)
      • sometimes system crash when a document is uploaded
    • no usable version control system included, no history functions
    • notes/annotations: has to be implemented
    • user management not usable / has to be implemented
    • user interface: all web pages have to be implemented
    • not many extensions / templates
    • MPDL software
      • document upload: not stable through eXist

eSciDoc

  • URL: https://www.escidoc.org/
  • Advantages
    • scalable
    • is in test use at MPIWG: see Pubman
    • user management included (incl. LDAP)
    • version control system included
    • XML/XSL support
    • programming: Java
    • fulltext search contained (Lucene)
    • free software
  • Disadvantages
    • not in use by many users
    • performance of many queries not tested
    • very complicated: much work for administration and development (API etc.)
    • version control system: no easy usable history functions
    • notes/annotations: has to be implemented
    • not many users, installations and developers
    • user interface: all web pages have to be implemented
    • not many extensions / templates
    • XQuery support has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
    • MPDL software
      • get page fragment in XML document: has to be implemented in Java (relative easy)
      • language technology: has to be integrated by Java programs (relative easy)
      • viewer: has to be implemented in Java/XSL/HTML (relative easy)
      • document upload: has to be implemented (relative easy)

Attachments (6)

Download all attachments as: .zip