Changes between Version 16 and Version 17 of Metadata


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 12, 2009, 10:18:42 AM (15 years ago)
Author:
Wolfgang Schmidle
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Metadata

    v16 v17  
    2929(Maybe I should have left {{{<rdf:value>}}} instead of "text"? But then, consequently ALL "text" in {{{dcterms}}} definitions should in fact be {{{<rdf:value>}}}.)
    3030
    31 However, information is sparse. The syntax encoding schemes {{{dcterms:W3CDTF}}} and {{{dcterms:ISO639-3}}} do exist according to [http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ DCTERMS], but an up-to-date opionion about how to use syntax encoding schemes is difficult to obtain. The proposed recommendation [http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/09/01/dc-ds-xml/ 2008 XML Guidelines] uses {{{dcterm:date}}} only like this:
     31However, information is sparse. The syntax encoding schemes {{{dcterms:W3CDTF}}} and {{{dcterms:ISO639-3}}} do exist according to [http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/ DCTERMS], but an up-to-date opinion about how to use syntax encoding schemes is difficult to obtain. The proposed recommendation [http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/09/01/dc-ds-xml/ 2008 XML Guidelines] uses {{{dcterm:date}}} only like this:
    3232{{{
    3333<dcterms:date>2005-05-05</dcterms:date>