Conimbricensis 1606

Diversae (1606), Commentarii Collegii Conimbricensis e Societate Jesu ​ECHO

(Please note: There are several short titles in use, namely "Diversae", "Conimbricensis" and "Conimbricenses".)

Part of WO1. Sent with DESpecs version 1.1.2.

Sent: ok/date. Returned: 2009-02-05, ​raw text

1. First Analysis

Difficulties

• none?

Special Instructions

• <tf> tag for separate text flows, <q> and <a> tags for anchored comments (see attachment)

2. Questions From Formax

Question 1

Reply 1

Special Instructions 2008-11-26

Please note the following points regarding the marking of text flows and anchored marginal notes:

(a) Text flows

Text flow 1 has been marked correctly as <tf 1>, but text flow 2 has been only partially marked. It is important that text flow 2 be consistently marked. Kindly observe the following sample transcription. First it appears as you sent it to us:

Example: p.61 (without the marginal notes; some text is omitted):

<pb 59><rh>PRÆFATIO IN ISAGOGEM PORPHY.</rh>
$equuntur ... repugnet.</p>
<p>Cæteris ... a$pirarit.</p>
<tf 1>
<p it>igitur ... conabor.</p>
</tf>
<tf 2>
<p>Non ... collige-
</tf>
re, ... Chry$aorio.</p>
<p>b _Ari$totelis_] Quinque ... $ignificationem.</p>
<p>c _Genus, Differentia_] Notant ... po$$unt.</p>
<p>Seruauit ... Accidentium.</p>
<p>d _Cumque ad de$initiones_] Cognitionem ... appellat.</p>
<p>Qua ... cape$$enda.</p>
<p>Hoc ... vtile.

This is how we would like it:

<pb 59><rh>PRÆFATIO IN ISAGOGEM PORPHY.</rh>
<tf 1>
<p it>igitur ... conabor.</p>
</tf>
<tf 2>
$equuntur ... repugnet.</p>
<p>Cæteris ... a$pirarit.</p>
<p>Non ... collige-
re, ... Chry$aorio.</p>
<p><ac b> _Ari$totelis_]</ac> Quinque ... $ignificationem.</p>
<p><ac c> _Genus, Differentia_]</ac> Notant ... po$$unt.</p>
<p>Seruauit ... Accidentium.</p>
<p><ac d> _Cumque ad de$initiones_]</ac> Cognitionem ... appellat.</p>
<p>Qua ... cape$$enda.</p>
<p>Hoc ... vtile.
</tf>

(b) Anchored marginal notes

In the work sample only one anchored comment has been recognized. All other anchored comments have been omitted. We would appreciate your best efforts in tagging the anchored comments. In particular, we emphasize that <ac> should be used even if the corresponding anchor in the main text is not on the same page.

3. Analysis of the Result

Findings

Recommendation

4. Post-Processing