Changes between Version 14 and Version 15 of WO1_Pappus_1660
- Timestamp:
- Feb 2, 2009, 4:37:30 PM (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
WO1_Pappus_1660
v14 v15 16 16 === Difficulties === 17 17 18 * Greek text. Throughout the book, the typographer has often (but not always) placed the accent on the first letter of a diphthong. This can be corrected via post-processing. A rule for the automated correction, e.g. type \~ου as οῦ, would probably not work well.18 * Greek text. Mostly it is a simple, formalized style. Throughout the book, the typographer has often (but not always) placed the accent on the first letter of a diphthong. This can be corrected via post-processing. A rule for the automated correction, e.g. type \~ου as οῦ, would probably not work well. 19 19 20 20 … … 152 152 }}} 153 153 154 4: Hun@: ok. 155 156 5: {πρ}ὀς: optically this would be possible. 157 158 6: ἂρα ὠς: good enough (blame the typesetter). 159 160 154 161 [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView/ECHOzogiLib?pn=370&ws=1&wx=0.2173&wy=0.3829&ww=0.7681&wh=0.2249&mode=imagepath&url=%2Fmpiwg%2Fonline%2Fpermanent%2Flibrary%2FA0VHBVNN%2Fpageimg p.370] 155 162 … … 173 180 }}} 174 181 182 They mark Greek letters as italics. Does it make sense ot explicitly tell them otherwise? 175 183 184 4 (@ν), 7 (ἁπὸ), 13 (ἄπὸ), 14 (@ ἁντὸ@), 14/15 ({τοῦ}τ{ἐστι}): They type faithfully what they see. No complaint here. 185 186 12: <sc>AE</sc>: typo in the Latin part (should be AB). _Græcts_: again, they should use <?>. 176 187 177 188 === Recommendation ===