Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of WO10_Belidor_1745

Timestamp:

Nov 17, 2010, 1:29:41 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

Klaus Thoden

Comment:

--

WO10_Belidor_1745

@@ -109 +109 @@
 }}}
 
+Q Please see your reply on 26.10.10 Book [wiki:WO10_Belidor_1745 Belidor_1745], in that reply, we need use an abbreviated way of marking simple exponents for the superscript such as {{{a<^>2</^>}}} should be code as {{{a2}}}, but we found in today's reply, the superscript is marked as {{{^}}} such as {{{y^4}}}, should we need use today's rule to correct the data for Belidor_1745? Also, should we also need use {{{<math>}}} to code the fractions in Belidor_1745 which separated and coded as a table? If yes, can you give us some samples for how to code the data in [http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView?url=%2Fmpiwg%2Fonline%2Fpermanent%2Flibrary%2FSNXKGUVW%2Fpageimg&viewMode=images&tocMode=thumbs&tocPN=1&query=&searchPN=1&queryType=&mode=imagepath&sn=&queryPageSize=10&pn=39 0039.jpg]/[http://echo.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/ECHOdocuView?url=%2Fmpiwg%2Fonline%2Fpermanent%2Flibrary%2FSNXKGUVW%2Fpageimg&viewMode=images&tocMode=thumbs&tocPN=1&query=&searchPN=1&queryType=&mode=imagepath&sn=&queryPageSize=10&pn=81 0081.jpg] in Belidor_1745? 
+
+A I am sorry about the confusion. Apparently my plain-text email got scrambled on its way from Berlin to Beijing. In my email I wrote "{{{a ^ 2}}}" (without the spaces), and in my system it is displayed correctly. I have checked with my collegue, and in her Email system it is displayed differently, namely as {{{a²}}} with a superscript-2. Apparently in your system it is displayed as {{{a2}}}. I don't know why it got scrambled in my Belidor-email but was displayed correctly in my Descartes-email. Similarly, _ nnyy _ may have been displayed incorrectly. 
+
 == 3.  Analysis of the Result ==