Euclid/Clavius? 1607

Euclid/Clavius? (1607), Elementorum Libri XV ​ECHO

Part of WO1. Sent with DESpecs version 1.1.2.

Sent: ok/date. Returned: ok, ​raw text.

1. First Analysis

Difficulties

• ​text in red: there is a rule for red text in version 1.1.2
• additional ligatures, e.g. _{$p}_: Will be added to version 1.2. For now, we will just see what happens.

• Tables

Special Instructions

• Examples of structures that should be typed as tables or as normal text; three examples from p.506.

(originally in ​DESpecs_special_tables.pdf)

2. Questions From Formax

Question 1

Reply 1

Final Instructions

3. Analysis of the Result

Findings

Offset <pb> to ECHO is 132, e.g. <pb 468> corresponds to p.600 in ECHO.

• "toc" starting on p.21 typed as normal <p>s:

<p>1 SVPER data recta linea terminata triangu-
lum æquilaterum con$tituere.</p>
<p>2 AD datum punctum, datæ rectæ lineæ æqua-
lem rectam lineam ponere.</p>

• first numbered pages (starting with p.133):

<pb 1>
<fig>
<h>EVCLIDIS
ELEMENTVM
PRIMVM.</h>
<h it>DEFINITIONES.</h>
<h>I.</h>
<p>PVNCTVM e$t, cuius pars nulla e$t.</p>
<p it>TQTVS hic primus liber in eo po$itus est, vt nobis
tradat ortus proprietates{que} triangulorum, tum quod
ad eorum angulos $pectat, tum quod adlatera: quæ
...
<pb 2>
...
debet exi$timari. Denique in magnitudine id concipi debet e$$e pun-
ctum, quod in numero vnitas, quodque intempore in$tans. Sunt e-
nim & hæc concipienda indiuidua.</p>
<h>II.</h>
<p>LINEA verò, longitudo latitudinis expers.</p>
<p it>DEFINIT bîc lineam, primam $peciem magnitudinis, quam
...

• heading levels
  1. EVCLIDIS ELEMENTVM PRIMVM.
  2. DEFINITIONES.
  3. I.

• Euclid in upright shape, comments in italics.

• figures: Only <fig> because the Specs didn't say more about the marking of figures, but correctly marked.

• tables: in the comments, e.g. pb 35, pb 359, pb 374 (= p.506 in the Special Instructions), all ok, not very often. Table on pb 468 marked as <fig>.

• marginal notes: e.g. pb 468: two marginal notes, anchors were correctly marked (<mgl a>, <n a>). Italics was not explicitly marked again.

Recommendation

4. Post-Processing